Judicial functions <b>of</b> the House <b>of< - LegalOwl
About us  |  Why use us?  |  Press  |  Contact us

 

Topic: Judicial functions <b>of</b> the House <b>of<



  
 Encyclopedia: <b>Houseb>-<<b>bb>>ofb>bb>>-Lords
<b>Theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords is not <b>theb> only court <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> last resort in <b>theb> United Kingdom; in some cases, that role is fulfilled by <b>theb> Privy Council.
<b>Theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords is an unelected body, consisting <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> two archbishops and 24 bishops <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> established Church <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> England ("Lords Spiritual") and 706 members <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> Peerage ("Lords Temporal").
<b>Theb> jurisdiction <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords extends, in civil and in criminal cases, to appeals from <b>theb> courts <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> England and Wales, and <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Northern Ireland.
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/House_of_Lords

  
 Thompson, 'Future Imperfect: Reform <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords', [2000] 4 Web JCLI
JUSTICE (2000) `<b>Theb> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>Judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>Functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords' Evidence to <b>theb> Royal Commission on <b>theb> Reform <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords at 0165.pdf in <b>theb> CD-Rom which accompanies Wakeham 2000.
Bingham, Lord (2000) `Reform <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords: Future <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> Appellate Committee' Evidence to <b>theb> Royal Commission on <b>theb> Reform <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords at 0022.pdf in <b>theb> CD-Rom which accompanies Wakeham 2000.
Lord Slynn pointed out that <b>theb> commission was not <b>theb> body to consider whether there ought to be a new Supreme Court and gave some <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> relevant technical issues (Slynn 2000).
http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/2000/issue4/thompson4.html

  
 UK Politics - <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords
In general, <b>theb> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords are similar to those <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Commons in legislating, debating and questioning <b>theb> executive.
<b>Theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Commons can present a bill (except one to prolong <b>theb> life <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Parliament) for Royal Assent after one year and in a new session even if <b>theb> Lords have not given their agreement.
<b>Theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords is <b>theb> second chamber <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> U.K. Houses <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Parliament.
http://www.britain.tv/ukpolitics_houseoflords.shtml

  
 Judicature Act 1873
Finally, when it became clear that <b>theb> English legal profession was firmly opposed to <b>theb> reform proposals, <b>theb> Appellate Jurisdiction Act 1876 removed <b>theb> provisions for <b>theb> abolition <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords, although it retained <b>theb> provisions that established <b>theb> High Court and <b>theb> Court <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Appeal.
Some have also expressed concerns that <b>theb> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords may violate <b>theb> European Convention <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Human Rights[?], since <b>theb> Law Lords can participate in framing legislation, and as such may not be an "an independent and impartial tribunal" under article 6 <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> that Convention.
<b>Theb> Lord Chancellor in <b>theb> Disraeli government sought to remove <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords jurisdiction for Scottish and Irish appeals as well, which would have completely removed its <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> jurisdiction.
http://www.eurofreehost.com/ju/Judicature_Act_1873.html

  
 Proposal for a wholly appointed Lords
I suggest that <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords be granted equality with <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Commons, except in <b>theb> case <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> money bills.
<b>Theb> number <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> seats in <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords would be equal to <b>theb> number <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Commons constituencies (currently 659).
<<b>bb>>Ofb>bb>> course, a breach <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> this convention in 1909 led to <b>theb> eventual passage <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> Parliament Act.
http://www.ukconstitution.net/politics/reforms/Lords_emsworth.html

  
 K-Zone law -- <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords: who needs it?
When <b>theb> reforming Bill was debated on <b>theb> floor <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Commons in 1968, <b>theb> objection was so fierce, and <b>theb> number <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> amendments tabled so large, that it took eleven days to debate <b>theb> first five clauses.
<b>Theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords was abolished for a short time under <b>theb> administration <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Cromwell, but was eventually restored along with <b>theb> monarchy.
Thus <b>theb> Lords were compelled to accept <b>theb> 1911 Parliament Act, which removed <b>theb> power to veto a money Bill altogether, and reduced <b>theb> power <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> veto in other matters to a power to delay for two years.
http://www.kevinboone.com/lords.html

  
 Peerage
Life peers created under <b>theb> Appellate Jurisdiction Act are known as "lords <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Appeal in Ordinary." They perform <b>theb> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords and serve on <b>theb> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>Judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> Committee <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> Privy Council.
In particularly contentious or complicated matters, <b>theb> case may be referred to <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords, who in turn refer it to <b>theb> Lords Committee for Privileges.
Peers <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Scotland and Ireland were not all members <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords; rather, they elected a limited number <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> representative peers from among their number (although all Scottish peers sat in <b>theb> <b>Houseb> between 1963 and 1999).
http://www.sciencedaily.com/encyclopedia/peerage

  
 PlanetPapers - Should there be a <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords?
In <b>theb> 1995-96 session, for example, 422 amendments to Government Bills were made in <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Commons compared to 1,133 amendments made in <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords.
<b>Theb> less crowded timetable <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> allows such a procedure to have all <b>theb> time it needs, as well as emphases on ensuring that <b>theb> bill is well drafted and coherent.
<b>Theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords plays an important part in revising legislation (58% <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> time in session is spend revising legislation) and keeping a check on Government by scrutinising its activities (38% <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> time in session is spent doing that).
http://www.planetpapers.com/Assets/3958.php

  
 Law: <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>Judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> Committee <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords
All members <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords who have served as senior judges, including former Lords <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Appeal in Ordinary and former Lord Chancellors, are Lords <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Appeal and can be called upon to help with <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> business until they reach <b>theb> age <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> 75.
However, in common with every other court in <b>theb> European Union they have <b>theb> power to refer points <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> law to <b>theb> European Court <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Justice and as a result <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> such a case <b>theb> Lords declared <b>theb> Maritime Shipping Act 1990 unenforceable in part.
Generally a case must be <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> great importance, due to its severity, complexity, level <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> money involved, public interest or other factors, before <b>theb> Lords will hear it.
http://hiv-aids.biz/Law/Judicial_Committee.shtml

  
 <b>THEb> <b>HOUSEb> <<b>bb>>OFb>bb>> LORDS
New Powers and <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>Functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> NSC: Concerning <b>theb> powers to be given to <b>theb> new or reformed second chamber, we also applaud its recommendations which endorse <b>theb> tradition <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> a primarily consultative upper <b>houseb> with limited direct legislative powers that leave <b>theb> HOC with <b>theb> primary legislative role in <b>theb> constitution.
<b>Theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Commons has traditionally been constituted as a nationally representative body with constituencies determined by territory and population in geographically delimited electoral districts, based on party nominations.
<b>Theb> essential logic <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> this rule rests on <b>theb> fact that because un(der)represented communities or minorities have no direct voice in <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Commons, that body should not have exclusive or ultimate jurisdiction in controversies involving these communities.
http://www2.hawaii.edu/~fredr/lords.htm

  
 <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords: 3D View <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> Web
HL <b>Theb> upper <b>houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Parliament in <b>theb> United Kingdom, made up <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> members <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> nobility and high-ranking clergy.
<b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords Judgments - <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords Judgments Judgments <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords delivered since 14 November 1996 published by <b>theb> court itself.
See live article   <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords Act 1999 <b>Theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords Act 1999, an Act <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Parliament passed by <b>theb> British Parliament, was a major constitutional enactment as it completely reformed one <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> chambers <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Parliament, <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords.
http://www.resolve3d.com/Arts/Music/Styles/Rock/HeavyMetal/HairMetal/BandsandArtists/HouseofLords

  
 <b>Theb> Ultimate Practice Statement - American History Information Guide and Reference
It does not affect <b>theb> precedential value <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> cases in lower courts; all other courts that recognise <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords as <b>theb> court <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> last resort are still bound by <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords decisions.
<b>Theb> Practice Statement 1966 is authority for <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords to depart from their previous decisions.
— Lord Gardiner's statement in <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords, July 26, 1966.
http://www.historymania.com/american_history/Practice_Statement

  
 Composition <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords
Some Lords are former Members <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Commons who have been elevated to <b>theb> Lords in recognition <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> distinguished service in politics or because one <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> political parties wishes to have them in <b>theb> <b>Houseb>.
There was traditionally a large number <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Conservative peers in <b>theb> Lords but this is no longer <b>theb> case since <b>theb> majority <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> hereditary peers were excluded from membership <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> following <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords Act 1999.
<b>Theb> composition <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords is different from that <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Commons.
http://www.parliament.uk/parliament/guide/locomp.htm

  
 BBC NEWS Politics Tories hail lord chancellor vote
Peers will continue to debate <b>theb> bill in <b>theb> autumn and may defeat <b>theb> government on its proposal to create a Supreme Court to take over <b>theb> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords.
<b>Theb> bill had proposed his jobs be split between a cabinet minister for <b>theb> constitution, a more powerful lord chief justice and speaker in <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords.
<b>Theb> lord chancellor is <b>theb> country's senior judge, a government minister and speaker <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3892175.stm

  
 List <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Appeal in Ordinary - Wikipedia, <b>theb> free encyclopedia
See also: <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>Judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords
<b>Theb> Lord Bingham <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Cornhill, KG, PC (Senior Lord <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Appeal in Ordinary)
<b>Theb> Lord Nicholls <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Birkenhead, PC (Second Senior Lord <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Appeal in Ordinary)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Lords_of_Appeal_in_Ordinary

  
 Two letters to <b>theb> Times
Justice would be served by unscrambling <b>theb> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords from its legislative <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> and setting up instead a supreme court headed by a judge who is manifestly and institutionally independent <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> government and legislature.
<b>Theb> supremacy <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Commons can be safeguarded by <b>theb> limits on <b>theb> second chamber’s powers, not by a blatantly undemocratic system <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> appointing its members.
Two <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> my letters, published by <b>Theb> Times in 1999 and 2002, appealing for second thoughts on just three <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> government's proposals for reform <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords:
http://www.barder.com/brian/1pointofview/lordslttrs.htm

  
 Middlesex Guildhall - Wikipedia, <b>theb> free encyclopedia
It is designated to be <b>theb> building for <b>theb> future Supreme Court <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> United Kingdom as created by <b>theb> Constitutional Reform Act 2005, which will be made up <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> Law Lords, who currently carry out <b>theb> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords.
<b>Theb> bulk <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> current building was built between 1906 and 1913, designed by J S Gibson, in what Pevsner termed an art nouveau gothic theme, and decorated with Mediæval-looking gargoyles and other architectural sculptures, some by Henry Charles Fehr.
<b>Theb> building is to be renovated according to plans by Lord Foster <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Thames Bank.
http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middlesex_Guildhall

  
 Haughton v. Smith - Wikipedia, <b>theb> free encyclopedia
Lord Dilhorne's statement about <b>theb> impossibility <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> crimes is often quoted at 19 (citing to All E.R..):
A man taking his own umbrella from a club, thinking it <b>theb> property <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> someone else, does not steal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haughton_v._Smith

  
 World Directory <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> National Parliamentary Libraries - United Kingdom <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Any other information: <b>Theb> Library provides research, information and bibliographic services in support <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> parliamentary and <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords
Record <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> business transacted by <b>theb> <b>Houseb>.
- In 1909 <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords itself took responsibility for <b>theb> publication <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> its debates through Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
http://www.bundestag.de/bic/bibliothek/library/kingd1.html

  
 <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords - Wikipedia, <b>theb> free encyclopedia
<b>Theb> Constitutional Reform Act 2005 transfered <b>theb> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> Lords to a new Supreme Court <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> United Kingdom.
<b>Theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords was not <b>theb> only court <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> last resort in <b>theb> United Kingdom; in some cases, that role was fulfilled by <b>theb> Privy Council.
<b>Theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords is an unelected body, consisting <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> two archbishops and 26 bishops <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> established Church <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> England ("Lords Spiritual") and 706 members <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> Peerage ("Lords Temporal").
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Lords   (7108 words)

  
 <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords White Paper.
11. <b>Theb> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> present <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords have legislative, deliberative, interrogative and <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> elements.
They are full members <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb>, even when not sitting in a <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> capacity, although by convention they do not become involved in politically contentious issues.
<b>Theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords has always attached importance to its ability to provide general advice and to initiate a general debate on important issues <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> day, in an atmosphere less pressurised than <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Commons by party political issues.
http://www.centreforcitizenship.org/wp7.html   (2700 words)

  
 Judicature Act 1873 Definition / Judicature Act 1873 Research
Finally, when it became clear that <b>theb> English legal profession was firmly opposed to <b>theb> reform proposals, <b>theb> Appellate Jurisdiction Act 1876 removed <b>theb> provisions for <b>theb> abolition <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords, although it retained <b>theb> provisions that established <b>theb> High Court and <b>theb> Court <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Appeal.
It reorganized <b>theb> English court system to establish <b>theb> High Court and <b>theb> Court <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Appeal.
However, <b>theb> Lord Chancellor could not muster <b>theb> necessary support in <b>theb> Parliament for <b>theb> bill in 1874 nor when he reintroduced it in 1875.
http://www.elresearch.com/Judicature_Act_1873   (2700 words)

  
 <b>THEb> <b>HOUSEb> <<b>bb>>OFb>bb>> LORDS
<b>Theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords now contains Law Lords who carry out <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> through committees on which they are <b>theb> members.
<b>Theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Commons has traditionally been constituted as a nationally representative body with constituencies determined by territory and population in geographically delimited electoral districts, based on party nominations.
<b>Theb> essential logic <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> this rule rests on <b>theb> fact that because un(der)represented communities or minorities have no direct voice in <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Commons, that body should not have exclusive or ultimate jurisdiction in controversies involving these communities.
http://www2.hawaii.edu/~fredr/lords.htm   (13613 words)

  
 Encyclopedia: Lord Chancellor
<b>Theb> Bill sought to abolish <b>theb> office <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lord Chancellor, and to transfer his <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> to other officials: legislative <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> to a Speaker <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords, executive <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> to <b>theb> Secretary <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> State for Constitutional Affairs and <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> to <b>theb> Lord Chief Justice.
<b>Theb> Bill also made other constitutional reforms, such as transferring <b>theb> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> duties <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords to a Supreme Court.
Nonetheless, ministerial threats to pass <b>theb> Bill without <b>theb> consent <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords (as permitted under <b>theb> Parliament Act 1911 and Parliament Act 1949) have been made.
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Lord-Chancellor   (13613 words)

  
 Life peerage
In 1856, it was determined necessary to add a peer learned in law to <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords (which exercised and continues to exercise certain <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>>), without allowing <b>theb> peer's heirs to sit in <b>theb> <b>Houseb> and swell its numbers.
<b>Theb> Appellate Jurisdiction Act originally provided for <b>theb> appointment <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> two Lords <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Appeal in Ordinary, who would continue to serve while holding <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> office, though in 1887, they were permitted to continue to sit in <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords for life, under <b>theb> style and dignity <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> baron.
Sir James Parke, a baron (judge) <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> Exchequer, was created Baron Wensleydale for life, but <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords concluded that <b>theb> peerage did not entitle him to sit in <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords.
http://alloffinance.com/Life_peerage.html   (2890 words)

  
 life peer 1
In 1856, it was determined necessary to add a peer learned in law to <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords (which exercised and continues to exercise certain <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>>), without allowing <b>theb> peer's heirs to sit in <b>theb> <b>Houseb> and swell its numbers.
<b>Theb> Appellate Jurisdiction Act originally provided for <b>theb> appointment <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> two Lords <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Appeal in Ordinary, who would continue to serve while holding <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> office, though in 1887, they were permitted to continue to sit in <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords for life, under <b>theb> style and dignity <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> baron.
To be appointed a Lord <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Appeal in Ordinary under <b>theb> Appellate Jurisdiction Act, an individual must have been a practising barrister for a period <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> fifteen years or must have held a high <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> office—Lord Chancellor, or judge <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> Court <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Appeal, High Court or Court <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Session—for a period <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> two years.
http://www.yourencyclopedia.net/life_peer_1.html   (2100 words)

  
 Life peer
In 1856, it was determined necessary to add a peer learned in law to <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords (which exercised and continues to exercise certain <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>>), without allowing <b>theb> peer's heirs to sit in <b>theb> <b>Houseb> and swell its numbers.
<b>Theb> Appellate Jurisdiction Act originally provided for <b>theb> appointment <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> two Lords <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Appeal in Ordinary, who would continue to serve while holding <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> office, though in 1887, they were permitted to continue to sit in <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords for life, under <b>theb> style and dignity <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> baron.
To be appointed a Lord <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Appeal in Ordinary under <b>theb> Appellate Jurisdiction Act, an individual must have been a practising barrister for a period <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> fifteen years or must have held a high <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> office—Lord Chancellor, or judge <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> Court <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Appeal, High Court or Court <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Session—for a period <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> two years.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/encyclopedia/life_peer_1   (2105 words)

  
 Lord Chancellor
Recent media reports suggest that while <b>theb> Lords may consent to some reforms, including <b>theb> Government's plans to create a supreme court to assume <b>theb> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords, it is unlikely to assent to <b>theb> outright abolition <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> Lord Chancellorship.
<b>Theb> Lord Chancellor has <b>theb> responsibility <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> presiding over <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords from <b>theb> Woolsack and keeping <b>theb> Great Seal, and is <b>theb> highest <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> officer in <b>theb> United Kingdom.
Lord Falconer duly appeared in <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords <b>theb> next working day in full-bottomed wig and breeches to preside as Lord Chancellor, as he is required to do by <b>theb> Standing Orders <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> every day <b>theb> <b>Houseb> is sitting unless he has obtained a leave <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> absence.
http://www.brainyencyclopedia.com/encyclopedia/l/lo/lord_chancellor.html   (2105 words)

  
 Lord Chancellor
Recent media reports suggest that while <b>theb> Lords may consent to some reforms, including <b>theb> Government's plans to create a supreme court to assume <b>theb> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords, it is unlikely to assent to <b>theb> outright abolition <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> Lord Chancellorship.
<b>Theb> Lord Chancellor has <b>theb> responsibility <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> presiding over <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords from <b>theb> Woolsack and keeping <b>theb> Great Seal, and is <b>theb> highest <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> officer in <b>theb> United Kingdom.
Lord Falconer duly appeared in <b>theb> <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Lords <b>theb> next working day in full-bottomed wig and breeches to preside as Lord Chancellor, as he is required to do by <b>theb> Standing Orders <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> <b>Houseb> every day <b>theb> <b>Houseb> is sitting unless he has obtained a leave <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> absence.
http://www.brainyencyclopedia.com/encyclopedia/l/lo/lord_chancellor.html   (2105 words)

  
 Constitutional Reform Act 2005
(10) <b>Theb> Lord Chief Justice <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> England and Wales may nominate a <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> office holder (as defined in section 109(4) <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> Constitutional Reform Act 2005) to exercise his <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> under this section.
(19) <b>Theb> Lord Chief Justice <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> England and Wales may nominate a <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>judicialb>bb>>bb>bb>>> office holder (as defined in section 109(4) <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> Constitutional Reform Act 2005) to exercise his <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> under this section, except his <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> under subsection (11A).
(12) <b>Theb> Lord President <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> Court <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Session may nominate a judge <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> Court <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> Session who is a member <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> First or Second Division <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> <b>theb> Inner <b>Houseb> <<b>bb>>ofb>bb>> that Court to exercise his <<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>>functionsb>bb>>bb>bb>>> under subsection (2A)(<<b>bb>>bb>bb>>).
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/50004--r.htm   (10646 words)

 About us   |  Why use us?   |  Press   |  Contact us

 Copyright © 2006 LegalOwl.com Usage implies agreement with terms.