Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty - LegalOwl
About us  |  Why use us?  |  Press  |  Contact us

 

Topic: Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty


  
 Nuclear proliferation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Indian ratification may be conditional upon the five weapons states agreeing to specific reductions in nuclear arsenals.
In May 1995, NPT parties reaffirmed their commitment to a Fissile Materials Cut-off Treaty to prohibit the production of any further fissile material for weapons.
In 1969, the United States terminated the inspections.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_proliferation   (6520 words)

  
 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
Duly certified copies of this Treaty shall be transmitted by the Depositary Governments to the Governments of the signatory and acceding States.
The Treaty was opened for signature on July 1, 1968, and signed on that date by the United States, the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and 59 other countries.
Further suggestions for strengthening the Treaty were made, and in the light of these, the United States and the Soviet Union submitted a new revised version, the seventh, to the First Committee of the General Assembly on May 31.
http://www.usun-vienna.rpo.at/npt1.htm   (4722 words)

  
 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty [NPT]
The Treaty was opened for signature on 01 July 1968, and signed on that date by the United States, the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and 59 other countries.
Under these agreements, all nuclear materials in peaceful civil facilities under the jurisdiction of the state must be declared to the IAEA, whose inspectors have routine access to the facilities for periodic monitoring and inspections.
There is no confirmed instance of State Party governmental transfers of nuclear weapon technology or unsafeguarded nuclear materials to any non-nuclear-weapon state.
http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/npt   (653 words)

  
 David Krieger, Devon Chaffee, Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Failure
In particular, the United States' persistent role in undermining the goals of the NPT should be clearly outlined by the other parties to the treaty.
Such policies undermine the negative security assurances promised by the United States in 1978 and reaffirmed at the 1995 NPT Review and Extension Conference.
In the past year not only has no progress been made in fulfilling these steps but NWS, the United States in particular, have pursued policies that demonstrate significant regression from fulfillment of their Article VI obligations.
http://www.transnational.org/forum/meet/2003/Krieger_NNPTreaty.html   (2120 words)

  
 The Real Nuclear Option - The Non-Proliferation Treaty is a mess. We have to save it anyway. By Fred Kaplan
The problem is, all treaties have an exit clause; it's an acknowledgement that the countries haven't signed away their sovereignty.
In those cases, the treaty must be amended to provide an enforcement clause—and, harder still, an enforcement agency.
Any plan to strengthen the NPT must not only shrink the loopholes but also deal with these more basic questions—which boil down to the issue of incentives.
http://www.slate.com/id/2117940   (1573 words)

  
 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
There were useful agreements on nuclear safety and liability, but most worryingly, sections dealing with export controls on nuclear materials and technology were watered down or lost altogether, and there were disturbing signs that Russia, China and France wished to weaken the agreements on full-scope safeguards.
Arrangements by all nuclear-weapon states to place, as soon as practicable, fissile material designated by each of them as no longer required for military purposes under IAEA or other relevant international verification and arrangements for the disposition of such material for peaceful purposes, to ensure that such material remains permanently outside of military programmes.
Reaffirmation that the ultimate objective of the efforts of States in the disarmament process is general and complete disarmament under effective international control.
http://www.acronym.org.uk/npt/npt18.htm   (2120 words)

  
 U.S. Statement at the 2005 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference
Nearly 190 states are now party to the Treaty, the greatest number of parties to any multilateral security agreement, save the United Nations Charter.
The NPT is fundamentally a treaty for mutual security.
For example, we have called upon the Conference on Disarmament to initiate negotiations on a Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty (FMCT).
http://www.state.gov/t/ac/rls/rm/45518.htm   (2307 words)

  
 Iran's Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
The United States is not involved in the talks, but backs the Europeans who are continuing their negotiations with Iran.
Daryl Kimball heads the Arms Control Association, a non-profit organization based in Washington D.C. He says ultimately, for the talks to succeed, the United States must be directly involved.
And to be able to get this far only by offering them economic benefits, which is all the Europeans can offer them, without the United States having entered the game, is pretty impressive."
http://www.payvand.com/news/05/may/1120.html   (601 words)

  
 ArmsControlWonk an arms control weblog: Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)
The Soviets may have pressured North Korea to join the NPT in 1985 as a condition of supplying the reactor, but Pyongyang delayed signing an inspections agreement for several years.
It’s led by someone who H Chavez of Venezuela tried to overthrow.
Israel, India, Pakistan have always refused to sign the treaty.
http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/index.php?id=749   (1100 words)

  
 The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and the International Atomic Energy Agency : Non-Proliferation Treaty
Nuclear Disarmament Plan of Action, Final Document, 2000 NPT Review Conference
For NGO opinion, statements and documents from the 2004 PrepCom and past NPT meetings see http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org.
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, Statement to the NPT Review Conference, May 2, 2005
http://www.acronym.org.uk/npt   (1811 words)

  
 A Nuclear Blunder? - Newsweek National News - MSNBC.com
The treaty’s provisions had to be updated to prevent countries like Iran from enriching uranium under cover of a peaceful civilian program—which is technically permitted under the NPT—when what Tehran really sought was a bomb, according to the administration.
And why has the United States been losing control of the conference’s agenda this week to Iran and other countries—a potentially serious setback to U.S. efforts to isolate Tehran?
But if the NPT needed so much fixing under U.S. leadership, why was the United States so shockingly unprepared when the treaty came up for its five-year review at a major conference in New York this month, in the view of many delegates?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7817986/site/newsweek   (900 words)

  
 Dennis Kucinich on Weapons and Non-Proliferation
Sign and enforce the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.
I have been a strong supporter of the Mine Ban Treaty and of its ratification by the United States.
In 2001, I joined with 124 members of Congress to urge President Bush not to abandon efforts to ban antipersonnel land mines.
http://www.kucinich.us/issues/nuclearnp.php   (197 words)

  
 Democracy Now! U.S. Enters New Nuclear Age as Bush Seeks Funds for New Generation of Nukes
The United States is also involved in upgrading its Trident warheads.
But the United States cannot make a new generation of nuclear weapons under the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
This has been a U.S. law since 1970.
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/03/02/148233   (1351 words)

  
 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
With details of the deal still under wraps, it appears that at least one-third of current and planned
Worse, for the president, this appears to be another give away to a foreign government at the expense of
This new blueprint for the international nuclear non-proliferation regime reflects input from experts and officials in the United States and twenty countries across Europe, Asia, the Middle East, the former Soviet states and Russia.
http://www.carnegieendowment.org/npp   (1406 words)

  
 Liaquat Ali Khan: Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Poised to Fall Apart
All that is required is a three months advance notice.
It allows a signatory state to withdraw from the non-proliferation regime "if it decides that extraordinary events, related to the subject matter of this Treaty, have jeopardized the supreme interests of its country.
But no good faith effort, as the Treaty requires, is being made towards complete nuclear disarmament.
http://www.counterpunch.org/khan05042005.html   (1947 words)

  
 CNN.com - North Korea leaves nuclear pact - Jan. 10, 2003
North Korea announced in 1993 that it was withdrawing from the treaty, but later suspended the decision and entered talks with the United States.
In 1968, Great Britain, the United States and the Soviet Union signed the treaty agreeing not to transfer nuclear weapons to other nations, or to assist or encourage other nations to develop their own nuclear devices.
North Korea promised to give up its nuclear weapons program and allow inspections to verify that it did not have the material such weapons would require.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/asiapcf/east/01/10/nkorea.treaty   (616 words)

  
 Arms Control Association: Fact Sheets: The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty at a Glance
Article X establishes the terms by which a state may withdraw from the treaty, requiring three month's advance notice should "extraordinary events" jeopardize its supreme national interests.
The remainder of the treaty deals with its administration, providing for a review conference every five years and a decision after 25 years on whether the treaty should be extended.
Although Article X of the NPT requires that a country give three months notice in advance of withdrawing, North Korea argued that it satisfied this requirement because it originally announced its decision to withdraw March 12, 1993, and suspended the decision one day before it was to become legally binding.
http://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/nptfact.asp   (546 words)

  
 BBC NEWS Americas An old treaty for a new world?
There were fears that without such an agreement there might be 15 or 20 nuclear-armed states within a similar number of years.
None of the nuclear weapon states are prepared to give up their nuclear arsenals
Other than the big five nuclear powers, all other countries joined the treaty as non-nuclear armed states.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4504511.stm   (947 words)

  
 USATODAY.com - Nuclear non-proliferation treaty
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Non-weapon states agree not to try to get nuclear arms.
Countries that have nuclear weapons will not help other countries obtain or develop them.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2003-01-10-nuclear-treaty-facts_x.htm   (141 words)

  
 Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty Ourmedia
Professor Michael Wallace present the little,known facts aabout chapter five of the Non-proliferation Treaty Quick Time movie 16 Mgbts, 16 minutes.
Submitted by VCTA on September 21, 2005 - 5:51am.
http://www.ourmedia.org/node/61361   (172 words)

 About us   |  Why use us?   |  Press   |  Contact us

 Copyright © 2006 LegalOwl.com Usage implies agreement with terms.