|
| Â Â |
| Â | Definition of Injunction |
 | | An injunction is an equitable remedy in the form of a court order that prohibits ("enjoins" or "restrains") a party from continuing a particular activity. | | | In United States law, a temporary restraining order (or TRO) may be issued on a short-term basis until the court decides whether to issue a preliminary injunction. | | | It is usually necessary to prove the high likelihood of success upon the merits of one's case and a likelihood of irreparable harm in the absence of a preliminary injunction before such an injunction may be granted; otherwise the party may have to wait for trial to obtain a permanent injunction. |
|
http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Injunction
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | [No title] |
| | A permanent injunction is distinguished from a "preliminary" injunction which the court issues pending the outcome of a lawsuit or petition asking for the "permanent" injunction. | | | a final order of a court that a person or entity refrain from certain activities permanently or take certain actions (usually to correct a nuisance) until completed. |
|
http://dictionary.law.com/definition2.asp?selected=1510&bold=
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | John Zuccarini |
| | The court order permanently bars the defendant from: redirecting or obstructing consumers on the Internet in connection with the advertising, promoting, offering for sale, selling, or providing any goods or services on the Internet, the World Wide Web or any Web page or Web site; and launching the Web sites of others without their permission. | | | At the request of the Federal Trade Commission, the court permanently barred the defendant from diverting or obstructing consumers on the Internet and from launching Web sites or Web pages that belong to unrelated third parties. | | | The court also has barred the defendant from participating in advertising affiliate programs on the Internet, and has ordered him to give up more than $1.8 million in ill-gotten gains. |
|
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2002/05/cupcake.htm
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | Chiropractic Antitrust Suit: Permanent Injunction |
| | Nor does this Permanent Injunction restrict or otherwise interfere with the AMA's right to petition or testify before any public today on any legislative or regulatory measure or to join or cooperate with any other entity in so petitioning or testifying. | | | As port of the injunctive relief to be ordered by the court against the AMA, the AMA shall be required to send a copy of this Permanent Injunction Order to each of its current members. | | | The question now before the court is the form of injunctive relief that the court wi I I order. |
|
http://www.chirobase.org/08Legal/AT/at04.html
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | SupremeCourtOnline.com - Case - 7783 - Permanent injunction - Appellants-plaintiffs having long standing possession - ... |
| | The High Court, in our view, by an erroneous legal approach, disturbed the order of injunction granted by the Trial Court. | | | However, it must be made clear that the injunction granted by the Trial Court would enure to the benefit of the plaintiffs till appropriate order is passed and action is taken pursuant thereto by the Panchayat in accordance with law. | | | The expression of views on the aspect of title either by the High Court or by the Trial Court was unnecessary. |
|
http://www.supremecourtonline.com/cases/7783.html
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | New York State Accountancy Laws |
| | Defendants then tendered a Rule 68 offer of judgment that provided for a permanent injunction, and the court accordingly issued an order of permanent injunction. | | | The issue on appeal was whether the district court's finding (in its opinion granting the preliminary injunction) that defendant had acted in bad faith was law of the case for the purposes of the application for attorney fees. | | | As this mechanism is closely analogous to the more informal procedure of consenting to entry of a permanent injunction, the case law interpreting Rule 68 may shed some light on the issue under consideration here. |
|
http://www.nysscpa.org/decision/introduction.html
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | Ralph Fucetola, JD, The Vitamin Lawyer, Permanent Internet injunction |
| | Upon reviewing the Verified Complaint and documents submitted with regard to this matter, and considering the Testimony and Exhibits offered by Plaintiffs, the Court is satisfied as to the sufficiency of the application for Judgment by Default and Permanent Injunction, and for good cause shown, | | | This matter was brought before the Court upon Motion for Judgment by Default and Permanent Injunction. | | | The Court has considered the Verified Complaint and Amendment thereto, the Order to Show Cause of October 7, 2002, the Preliminary Injunction of October 30, 2002 and the moving papers. |
|
http://www.lifespirit.org/perminunct.html
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | Permanent Injunction Issued Against Missouri Concealed-Guns Measure |
| | Topic: Permanent Injunction Issued Against Missouri Concealed-Guns Measure | | | Topic: Permanent Injunction Issued Against Missouri Concealed-Guns Measure (Read 22 times) | | | Ohmer granted a temporary injunction Oct. 10 blocking the concealed-guns law, which would have taken effect the following day. |
|
http://discuss.agonist.org/yabbse/index.php?board=1;action=display;threadid=13435
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | Federal Trade Commission v. Assail, Inc. (Texas 05/10/2004) |
| | Contrary to Par 3's assertion, the district court had the power to convert the preliminary injunction into a permanent injunction; it is settled that a district court has jurisdiction to proceed with the merits of the case and to grant a permanent injunction while an appeal of a preliminary injunction order is pending. | | | Grupo Mexicano, 527 U.S. at 317-18 (holding that an appeal from a preliminary injunction was not rendered moot by an order granting a permanent injunction, where the issue appealed "[was] independent of [the plaintiffs'] claim on the merits" and "ha nothing to do with the validity of the permanent injunction"). | | | As Par 3 admits (repeatedly) in its brief to this court, the objections it has to the preliminary injunction are the same objections it would have to the permanent injunction. |
|
http://www.assetprotectionbook.com/TX_FTC-Assail_2004.htm
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | Motion for Summary Judgement and Permanent Injunction |
| | A Permanent Injunction be issued by this court prohibiting the Treasurer, the Commissioner, and the Internal Revenue Service or any other taxing authority from arbitrarily despoiling him of his labor by using their tax laws or arbitrarily interfering with his ability to contract his labor. | | | Comes now the Plaintiff, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to move that this court grant Summary Judgement and Permanent Injunction against defendants, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and upon those persons in active concert or participation with them. | | | Actual damages for $100,000 be awarded because of the Plaintiff's inability to further contract his labor with Hatcher Construction Services, and Punitive damages in the amount of $200,000 be granted for violation of Plaintiff's 5th, 9th, 13th and 14th Amendment rights. |
|
http://www.restoreliberty.com/summary.htm
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | MPAA ICRAVE Press Releases |
| | Defendants shall file and serve on plaintiffs a report within 10 days after the entry of this Permanent Injunction setting forth in detail the manner in which defendants are complying with this Permanent Injunction. | | | The bond posted by plaintiffs in connection with the Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction is hereby released. | | | If plaintiffs contend that the requirements of ¶ 3 should remain in place after that date, they shall consult with defendants about stipulating to a possible modification of this Permanent Injunction. |
|
http://www.mpaa.org/Press/iCrave_Permanent_Injunction.htm
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | Armstrong 94-2307 Permanent Injunction |
| | Within forty-five days of the date of this injunction, the parties shall file a joint and mutually acceptable plan for monitoring this injunction or separate briefs describing each party's position on the need for a Special Master and the Court's authority to appoint one. | | | The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this injunction. | | | Plaintiffs shall thereafter have thirty days to submit written comments and the parties shall negotiate in good faith to resolve any disagreements.If any disputes remain, Plaintiffs shall file a regularly noticed motion regarding the disputed issues within 150 days of the date of this injunction. |
|
http://www.prisonlaw.com/Armstrong_Injunction.htm
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | Announcement & Presentation of Certified Copy of Permanent Court Injunction for Internet Libel |
| | In light of the foregoing, Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law and the issuance of an injunction prohibiting Defendant from repeating her false statements is necessary to protect Plaintiff's rights. | | | Announcement & Presentation of Certified Copy of Permanent Court Injunction for Internet Libel | | | of Permanent Court Injunction Against Libel on the Internet |
|
http://www.geocities.com/grif-con_legal
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | #676: 12-09-03 UTAH FEDERAL COURT BARS NATIONWIDE “EMPLOYEE LEASING” TAX SCAM |
| | According to the civil injunction complaint filed by the Justice Department, D. | | | Information on other injunctions the Justice Department has obtained against tax-scheme promoters can be found at www.usdoj.gov/tax/taxpress2003.htm. | | | More information about the Justice Department’s Tax Division can be found at www.usdoj.gov/tax. |
|
http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2003/December/03_tax_676.htm
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | Akamai wins permanent injunction against Digital Island |
| | U.S. District Court Judge Rya W. Zobel will issue the final wording of the injunction to be granted against Digital Island, Akamai says. | | | - A federal judge in Boston has granted Akamai Technologies its motion for a permanent injunction against Digital Island to stop it from running its Footprint content delivery service, the latest twist in a legal battle that began nearly two years ago. | | | "The injunction is a legal technicality about a legacy part of the CDN that was abandoned some time ago," says Chris Albinson, chief strategy officer for Exodus, a Cable & Wireless Service, which is the name of the business unit formed by the integration of C&W acquisitions Exodus and Digital Island. |
|
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2002/0702akwin.html
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | [No title] |
| | This Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action for all purposes, including without limitation, all proceedings involving the interpretation, enforcement or amendment of this Order and Permanent Injunction. | | | PAGE 6 - ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION prosecution for contempt of this Court. | | | The trial before the jury having been concluded, and the jury having found that defendants did issue true threats against plaintiffs, and this Court having found that plaintiffs are without an adequate remedy at law, the Court takes the following findings: 1. |
|
http://www.lektrik.com/PPvsACLA/PI990225.txt
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | politechbot.com: CyberPatrol lawsuit archive |
| | Any violation of this Injunction shall be determined by the Court only on the filing by Plaintiffs of a Motion for to Show Cause Why a Certain Person or Entity Should Not be Held in Contempt and after a full hearing thereon. | | | Upon the stipulation and agreement of Plaintiffs Microsystems Software, Inc and Mattel, Inc. and Defendants Eddy L.O. Jansson ("Jansson") and Matthew Skala ("Skala"), the verified Complaint, the Affidavit of Irwin B. Schwartz in Further Support of Application for Temporary Restraining Order filed March 17, 2000, and the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. | | | The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow a Court to accomplish service and notice of injunctive orders by "personal service or otherwise." Fed R.Civ.P. 65(d). |
|
http://www.politechbot.com/cyberpatrol/final-injunction.html
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | LEXIS®-NEXIS® Academic Universe - Document |
| | The orders should be reversed, without [***21] costs, and the cases remitted to Supreme Court, Albany County to grant an injunction which shall be vacated upon payment by defendant of such amounts of permanent damage to the respective plaintiffs as shall for this purpose be determined by the court. | | | The court at Special Term also found the amount of permanent damage attributable to each plaintiff, for the guidance of the parties in the event both sides stipulated to the payment and acceptance of such permanent damage as a settlement of all the controversies among the parties. | | | Although the court at Special Term and the Appellate Division held that injunction should be denied, it was found that plaintiffs [*225] had been damaged in various specific amounts up to the time of the trial and damages to the respective plaintiffs were awarded for those amounts. |
|
http://www1.mwc.edu/~bhansen/boomer.htm
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | AR.net >> Oxford University Obtains Permanent Injunction Against Animal Rights Extremists |
| | The injunction also prohibits those named in it from publishing the personal details of any of those protected individuals. | | | He also pointed out that those undertaking criminal action were unlikely to be deterred by the additional barrier of a legal injunction. | | | In issuing the injunction, Justice Grigson said that the injunction did not limit anyone's ability to express his or her views, but |
|
http://www.animalrights.net/archives/year/2004/000459.html
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | Williams Permanent Injunction |
| | The matter before the Court is plaintiff's Motion For Permanent Injunction With Respect To Williams, which will be treated as a motion for default judgment. | | | ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion For Permanent Injunction With Respect to Williams is granted. | | | Notice of default was entered as to defendant Williams by the Clerk of the Court on October, 15, 1997. |
|
http://www.patents.com/ac/willord.htm
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | Pitt seeks permanent injunction in Henson same-sex benefits case |
| | As part of its motion seeking the permanent injunction, Pitt requested in a cover letter that Gallo suspend a ruling until he reviewed any appeals the Henson attorneys file in response to his April 20 decision. | | | The civil suit alleges Pitt discriminated under terms of the 1990 Pittsburgh Human Relations Act which prohibits discrimination in employment, including discrimination in compensation, on the basis of sexual orientation. | | | Pitt seeks permanent injunction in Henson same-sex benefits case |
|
http://www.pitt.edu/utimes/issues/32/000525/13.html
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief |
| | Award Plaintiff the costs of bringing this action, as well as such other and additional relief as the Court may determine to be just and proper. | | | WHEREFORE plaintiff Federal Trade Commission pursuant to Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.§ 53(b), and the Court's own equitable powers, requests that this Court: | | | Award such relief as the Court finds necessary to redress injury to consumers resulting from Defendants' violations of the FTC Act including the refund of monies paid and the disgorgement of ill-gotten monies; and |
|
http://www.ftc.gov/os/2001/07/chrisent-complaint.htm
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | ‘Permanent’ Court Injunction Halts Conceal and Carry Permits |
| | ‘Permanent’ Court Injunction Halts Conceal and Carry Permits | | | The opponents of the conceal and carry law placed the quarter million dollar bond to secure the injunction to cover expenses of the delay of the law if it ultimately is found to be constitutional. | | | It will take action by the Missouri Supreme Court to finalize the new law to allow law-abiding citizens of the state to receive permits to carry concealed weapons. |
|
http://www.memphisdemocrat.com/2003/news/031113_guns.shtml
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | Nolo v. Texas - Brief on the Merits of Relator Nolo Press |
| | Tab 14, R. The Supreme Court has exempted the UPL Committee from any requirement to post bonds to secure any temporary restraining orders, temporary injunctions, or permanent injunctions it may obtain against those it sues. | | | Donald T. Smith, et al., Cause No. 98-37698, 129th Dist. Court, Harris County, Texas (Plaintiff's Original Petition Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Temporary Injunction and Permanent Injunction and Petition for Declaratory Relief). | | | While one court has ruled that the State Bar Act does not permit the UPL Committee to seek to recover attorneys fees if it prevails in an injunction lawsuit, see Fadia v. |
|
http://www.nolo.com/texas/Merits_Nolo.html
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. MAPHIA |
| | A court may order a permanent injunction "to prevent or restrain infringement of [the owner's] copyright." 17 U.S.C. Generally, a showing of copyright infringement liability and the threat of future violations is sufficient to warrant permanent injunction. | | | When judgment is entered in this case, the preliminary injunction presently in place will be entered as a permanent injunction. | | | The Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §504, provides that the copyright holder may elect either actual damages or statutory damages as a remedy for copyright infringement. |
|
http://www.loundy.com/CASES/Sega_v_MAPHIA2.html
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | Cyberspace v. Engler |
| | The case was then returned to the district court court for a ruling on the actual constitutionality of the law, as opposed to simply deciding if a temporary injunction should be in place. | | | Arguments for the plaintiffs were presented by attorney Andrew A. Nickelhoff of the Detroit firm of Sachs, Waldman, O'Hare, Helveston, Bogas and McIntosh, P.C. On July 29, 1999, Judge Tarnow granted a preliminary injunction, preventing the Act from being enforced until further legal action was taken. | | | This was written as a statement of our case for use in the "Request for Preliminary Injunction," but was not included in the final version. |
|
http://www.cyberspace.org/lawsuit
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | ACLU_OR Litigation: Planned Parenthood v. ACLA Injunction Brief |
| | Finally, a defendant charged with contempt for failure to comply with an injunction is generally barred from challenging the validity of the injunction and is, instead, limited to contesting the charge of noncompliance with the court order as a factual matter. | | | Paragraph 1 of the proposed injunction enjoins defendants and their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, successors and assigns, and "all persons in active concert or participation with any of them who receive actual notice of this Judgment or the 'Notice set forth in paragraph 4." Proposed Permanent Injunction, page 2, lines 18-19. | | | In light of these anticipated factual findings by the Court, which follows a full trial on the merits, a request by plaintiffs for a permanent injunction does not raise the same level of concern normally present when an injunction against speech has been requested before a trial on the merits has taken place. |
|
http://www.aclu-or.org/ppbrief2.htm
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | EB2 Class Action--Permanent Injunction Issued |
| | May 4, 2000 - Berry, Appleman and Leiden, in conjunction with the law firm of Van Der Hout and Brigagliano, today announced that the United States District Court issued an Order granting class certification and issuing a permanent injunction against INS in the EB2 class action lawsuit. | | | INS, Case No. C-99-5211 MMC, N.D. challenged the INS denial of employment based second preference (EB2) I-140 petitions where the underlying approved labor certification (ETA 750A) states that the employer will accept an individual with a bachelor’s degree plus five years experience in lieu of a master’s degree. |
|
http://www.immigrationlinks.com/news/news269.htm
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | 95-3-13. Trial; evidence; costs; permanent injunction. |
| | The action when brought shall be triable at the next term of court, provided process shall have been served for twenty or more days, otherwise at the following term, and said cause shall have precedence over all other cases except election contests, or injunctions. | | | If the action is brought by a person who is a citizen of the county and the court finds that there were no reasonable grounds or cause for said action, the costs may be taxed to such person. |
|
http://www.mscode.com/free/statutes/95/003/0013.htm
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | ACLU in the Court: Permanent Injunction in Chandler v. James |
| | The court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter until further order of the court, with power to enforce the provisions of this PERMANENT INJUNCTION by all means, writs, and remedies available to it, including, but not limited to, the exercise of its powers of contempt for violation of the terms hereof. | | | If a nomination is not made by the Defendants within forty-five (45) days of the date of this PERMANENT INJUNCTION, the court will select the curricular materials, with due regard for the recommendation of the court-appointed monitor. | | | This example is not meant by the court to suggest any form of expression to any student or to suggest that this is the only such reference that would be permissible. |
|
http://archive.aclu.org/court/alabama_injunction.html
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | U.S. District Court - Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief (October 15, 1998) -- FTC, et ... |
| | §§ 59.1-196 et seq., to secure a permanent injunction, preliminary relief and other equitable relief, civil penalties and reimbursement of its costs, expenses and attorney's fees, against defendant for its deceptive acts and practices in violation of Va. Code § 59.1-200. | | | ("Deceptive Trade Practices Act" or "DTPA"), to secure a permanent injunction, preliminary relief and other equitable relief, civil penalties, and attorneys' fees, against defendant for its unfair or deceptive acts or practices in violation of §§ 17.46(a) and (b) of the DTPA. | | | §§ 75-1.1 et seq., to secure a permanent injunction, preliminary relief and other equitable relief, civil penalties, and attorneys' fees, against defendant for its unfair or deceptive acts or practices in violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. |
|
http://www.pestlaw.com/x/courts/unitedindustries.html
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | Welch et al. Permanent Injunction |
| | The matter before the Court is plaintiff and defendants Robert A. Welch and Advanced Concepts' Joint Motion for Entry of Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction. | | | The Court has reviewed the file and determined that there is no just reason for delay, and that judgment should be entered immediately in favor of plaintiff and against defendants Welch and Advanced Concepts. | | | ORDERED that the Joint Motion for Entry of Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction is granted, and Judgment is entered pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). |
|
http://www.patents.com/ac/welchord.htm
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | INS News Release on LULAC Permanent Injunction |
| | The permanent injunction requires INS to adjudicate the legalization applications of aliens who can establish that they were "front-desked" during the legalization application period. | | | District Court Issues Permanent Injunction in 'Late Amnesty' Case | | | The questionnaire is not limited to class members in the Newman/LULAC case, although the injunction applies only to that case. |
|
http://www.immigrationlinks.com/news/news039.htm
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | Parker v. C.N. Enterprises, Permanent Injunction |
| | The Court also finds that it was necessary for the Plaintiffs to retain the services of attorneys in order to redress this damages, and that the Plaintiffs are entitled to an award of their reasonable attorney's fees. | | | In light of the evidence, the Court finds that the Plaintiffs are entitled to a permanent injunction. | | | The Court further finds that the Plaintiffs, including the Plaintiffs Texas Internet Service Providers Association and its members, and EFF-Austin and its members, will suffer irreparable harm if the Defendants are not prohibited from using other Internet domain names without permission as the return addresses of their mass mailings. |
|
http://www.loundy.com/CASES/Parker_v_CN_Enterprises.html
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | Investigators' Reports--March-April 1998 FDA Consumer |
| | The later court actions put a permanent end to Loran's unapproved activity. | | | When Loran failed to respond adequately, FDA initiated proceedings that led to a temporary restraining order in June 1996, a preliminary injunction the following month, and, most recently, the permanent injunction. | | | FDA officials say the agency put Loran on notice several times for violating the law before taking legal action against the company. |
|
http://www.fda.gov/fdac/departs/1998/298_irs.html
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | DOE v STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY - Legal Case Documents |
| | The Court, having reviewed these comments and having further reviewed the authority submitted ermanent injunction for the reasons stated below. | | | This Court earlier entered a preliminary injunction by Order dated May 5, 1998, but te. | | | This Court earlier entered a preliminary injunction by Order dated May 5, 1998, but invited |
|
http://www.legalcasedocs.com/120/239/506.html
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | EMC Wins Permanent Injunction Ruling |
| | A judge of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina issued a permanent injunction against Triangle for using EMC's maintenance software, training materials, engineering documents and other EMC intellectual property without EMC's consent. | | | EMC countered by filing its own patent infringement complaint against HP in US District Court in Worcester, charging that certain HP products infringe six of its patents. | | | EMC ( Quote, Chart) triumphed in court Wednesday when a judge barred Cary, N.C.-based Triangle Technology Services from using some of its copyrighted software and trade secrets related to the Hopkinton, Mass. |
|
http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/1487281
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | FLORIDA COURT ISSUES PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST JAMES V. DOWLER, JR. |
| | Under the terms of the permanent injunction, the defendants are permanently enjoined from (1) further violating the CEA, CFTC regulations and FSIPA, (2) from operating as a CTA, CPO or associating therewith, and (3) from seeking registration with the Commission in any capacity. | | | Under the consent order entered by the court, Dowler is required to make full restitution to DandB Trading's former customers. | | | Settlement Stems from Jointly Filed CFTC and State of Florida Charges that the Defendants Acted as an Unregistered CTA, Unregistered CPO and Cheated, Defrauded and Embezzled more than $970,000 From Customers |
|
http://www.cftc.gov/opa/enf97/opadowler-out.htm
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | Microtune claims permanent injunction against Broadcom |
| | After voluntarily closing its disputes with Intel this month - with Broadcom paying Intel $60m to end all litigation - Microtune announced on Wednesday that a federal judge ordered a permanent injunction against Broadcom in the patent infringement lawsuit against the broadband player. | | | Broadcom is close to the end of another legal entanglement, although perhaps not to its favour. | | | In its permanent injunction, the court stopped the sale, importing, marketing and shipment in the US of all Broadcom tuners and reference designs found to be infringing for the life of Microtune's patent No. 5,737,035, Microtune said. |
|
http://www.electronicsweekly.com/Article34682.htm
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | 44-2014 - Permanent injunction; permanent conservator or receiver |
| | B. The court, upon the hearing and after hearing the evidence, may dismiss the complaint or make the preliminary injunction permanent, restraining the defendant from removing, encumbering or otherwise disposing of his property, and may make permanent the order of the temporary appointment of a conservator or receiver. | | | A. The complaint, together with the order of the court setting the time of hearing, shall be served upon the defendant together with the notice of the time of hearing. | | | 44-2014 - Permanent injunction; permanent conservator or receiver |
|
http://www.azleg.state.az.us/ars/44/02014.htm
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | ACLU Press Release: 09-08-2000 -- ACLU Wins Victory in Medical Marijuana Case |
| | Judge Alsup issued a permanent injunction that bans the government from revoking doctorÕs licenses and prohibits the government from initiating investigations of physicians who have provided advice on the medical use of marijuana. | | | Striking a victory for free speech, U.S. District Judge William Alsup ruled on September 7th that federal authorities can not revoke the licenses of doctors who recommend the medical use of marijuana to their patients. | | | At issue is the language of Proposition 215, approved by California voters in November 1996, which makes it legal for patients to grow and possess marijuana for medical use when recommended by a doctor. |
|
http://www.aclunc.org/pressrel/000908-medical.html
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | U.S. Department of Justice Files Consent Decree Of Permanent Injunction Against X-Cel Feeds, Inc. Based on Violations ... |
| | X-Cel and its officers have signed and consented to the filing and entry of the Decree, which will take effect once it has been signed by a judge and entered by the Court. | | | U.S. Department of Justice Files Consent Decree Of Permanent Injunction Against X-Cel Feeds, Inc. Based on Violations of FDA's 1997 Animal Feed Rule | | | The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today announced the filing of a Consent Decree of Permanent Injunction against X-Cel, Feeds Inc., and individual officers based on violations of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. |
|
http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2003/NEW00924.html
|
|
| Â Â |
| Â | Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction against AuQuest, Inc. |
| | Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction against AuQuest, Inc. | | | The term "Prospect" shall mean a Person to whom the AuQUEST Marketing Program is shown, and who submits a signed application to AuQUEST with the required application fee. | | | Obtain a free demo of our software for corporate MLM companies and affiliate programs. |
|
http://www.mlmstartup.com/articles/b24auq2.htm
|
|
|
