UN Security Council Resolution 242 - LegalOwl
About us  |  Why use us?  |  Press  |  Contact us

 

Topic: UN Security Council Resolution 242


  
 UN Security Council Resolution 242 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
According to the legal principle "expressio unis et exclusio alterus" (which states that the terms excluded from a law are excluded intentionally, and the interpretation of that law should be accordingly altered) it could be argued against the "all territoires" reading.
In simple terms, the dispute is about whether the Resolution would require Israel to retreat from all the territories it has captured, or whether it would still comply with the resolution by retreating, on mutually agreed terms, only from some of the territories.
The representatives from Nigeria, France, USSR, Bulgaria, United Arab Republic, Jordan, Argentina and Mali supported this view, and as worded by the representative from Mali: "wishes its vote today to be interpreted in the light of the clear and unequivocal interpretation which the representative of India gave of the provisions of the United Kingdom text".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_242   (2253 words)

  
 Internal Israeli Politics
The subsequent American clarification of Resolution 338, which was the basis of Israel’s agreement to a cease-fire, established that the term "negotiation between the parties" means direct negotiations and that all agreements and maps that result from these direct negotiations be determined by agreement between the negotiating parties.
Second, according to the legal opinion of Israeli Attorney General Elyakim Rubinstein, UN Security Council Resolution 242 addresses the relationship between the countries that held sovereignty on June 4, 1967.
This important distinction recognizes that Israel has the right to live within "secure and recognized boundaries," as stated in the resolution.
http://www.hadassah.org/education/content/HotTopics/Israel/UNResolutions-internal.html   (976 words)

  
 Visions of Peace, Realities of Occupation
In 1988 the Palestine National Council accepted General Assembly Resolution 181 (the UN partition plan), calling for the internalization of the city as a corpus separatum.
In a recent letter, the European Union reiterated that it regards Jerusalem as a corpus separatum according to the terms of the 1947 partition plan.
Finally, there was the corpus separatum plan for Jerusalem proposed as part of the UN Partition plan.
http://www.jqf-jerusalem.org/1999/jqf6/dixon.html   (3045 words)

  
 Does the International News Media Overlook Israel's Legal Rights in the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict? - Dan Diker
Arafat's PLO was not mentioned in Resolution 242 and had no legal status under that resolution.
Despite the fact that the United Nations, the successor to the League of Nations, proposed that Jerusalem be divided as part of a corpus separatum, in General Assembly Resolution 181 of November 1947, the Arab armies' invasion of the fledgling Jewish state in May 1948 rendered UN Resolution 181 a "dead letter."
Major international legal experts such as former U.S. State Department Legal Advisor Steven Schwebel, who also headed the International Court of Justice at The Hague, further support Israel's position.
http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp495.htm   (2840 words)

  
 Defensible Borders for a Lasting Peace
The exclusion of the definite article "the" from the withdrawal clause was not decided by a low-level legal drafting team or even at the ambassadorial level.
Rogers was soon replaced, in any case, by Henry Kissinger, Nixon's national security advisor, who significantly modified Rogers' position.
In the future, would the United States remain sympathetic to Israel's security concerns so that such understandings can be reached?
http://www.defensibleborders.org/gold.htm   (4751 words)

  
 Palestine-UN.org
Many Security Council and other UN resolutions have dealt with specific Israeli grave breaches of the Convention and other acts contrary to its provisions, such as settlements, measures related to Jerusalem, deportations, indiscriminate shooting of civilians and collective punishment.
Many of those resolutions call upon Israel, the occupying Power, to comply with the provisions of the Convention and to accept its de jure applicability.
In response to Israel’s continuing illegal policies and measures in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, which have persisted since 1967 in flagrant violation of international humanitarian law and U.N. resolutions, the international community has acted to reassert its position.
http://www.palestine-un.org/info/occ.html   (3782 words)

  
 United Jerusalem - - J.C.P.A. -- 3/28/2002
U.S. and Israeli negotiators should realistically judge the success of the summit by the extent that it does not weaken the agreed terms of reference of negotiations in the past, particularly UN Security Council Resolution 242.
Language stating that a "fair solution" to the refugee issue must be reached or an "agreed solution" is necessary would be an improvement over the unrealistic call for a "right of return" to Israel itself.
The net result for Israel might be characterized as "242-minus." It would compromise Israel´s right to "secure and recognized boundaries" or "defensible borders" that has been the hallmark of U.S. policy from the time of Secretary of State Henry Kissinger through Secretary of State Warren Christopher.
http://www.unitedjerusalem.org/index2.asp?id=87097   (817 words)

  
 UN-group-pages-242-explained
A good legal argument can be made for people moving to areas where they have a strong historical connection, even though it may not be apart of the sovereign state of Israel, it is non the less perfectly legitimate under international law.
That original mandate is still valid, and as long the 'territories' are still in dispute, Jews have every legal right to be there.
UN Security Council Resolution 242 specifies that Israel must retreat from some territories, and not necessarily all of them.
http://www.geocities.com/a_i_l_i_info/UN-group-pages-242-explained.html?1104411201415   (724 words)

  
 Sharon Rewrites the Peace Script - Council on Foreign Relations
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of your project.
Instead, the effectiveness of the Palestinian Authority was measured by the United States "in terms of whether it increased Israel's sense of its security."
Although there are few examples of peace talks that did not take place concurrently with continued fighting between the parties, whether in the Balkans, Ireland or Vietnam, the United States bought into Sharon's idea, to its subsequent chagrin.
http://www.cfr.org/publication.html?id=4612   (1189 words)

  
 Inquiry and Analysis Series - No. 30
However, this contradicts Israel's acceptance, anchored in the Declaration of Principles, of Resolution 242 as the basis of the Oslo process.
PNC Chairman, Salim Al-Za'anoon, also, stated that "the decision of the Central Council in its previous session was that the declaration of the state should come before the end of the year, therefore the council will consider the many [possible] dates…" He stressed that the council is not tied to any of the proposed dates.
Israel, through its legal advisor Elyakim Rubinstein, recently reiterated its position that Resolution 242 does not apply to Palestinian territories that were not under Palestinian sovereignty before 1967.
http://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=subjects&Area=middleeast&ID=IA3000   (1193 words)

  
 Jewish Community Relations Council (jcrc.org)
This document contains a brief explanation of 242, and the actual text of the resolution.
UN Security Council Resolution 242 is the basis of the “Land for Peace” formula governing the Middle East Peace process.
The Partition and The War of Independence (94K)
http://www.jcrc.org/israel/101   (253 words)

  
 Dear Honest Reporting
etc, and agree on "secure and recognized boundaries".
within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force;"
Egypt and Jordan complied, and even that many years after the resolution
http://www.honestreporting.com/a/successfulcritique.htm   (414 words)

  
 Professor Louis Rene Beres -- The Myth Of The "Occupied" Territories
stems from its incontrovertible legal right to security and self-
1948; a State of Palestine was not promised by authoritative UN Security
Council Resolution 242; indeed, a State of Palestine has never existed.
http://www.newswithviews.com/israel/israel16.htm   (1059 words)

  
 Security Council Resolutions 1967
Resolution 239: Question concerning the Democratic Republic of Congo%20(19 Jun)
Resolution 241: Question concerning the Democratic Republic of Congo (15 Nov)
Resolution 243: Admission of new Members to the UN: Democratic Yemen (12 Dec)
http://www.un.org/documents/sc/res/1967/scres67.htm   (116 words)

  
 marginalia: Middle East Archives
A List of UN Security Council Resolutions “against Israel”
Expresses “alarm at the rejection of Security Council resolution 672 by the Israeli Government,” “[d]eplores the refusal of the Israeli Government to receive the mission of the Secretary-General [called for in 672] to the region,” and urges reconsideration and the full compliance with 672.
Discussion of this resolution at the 2001 United Nations Anti-Racism Summit in Durban, South Africa led the US and Israeli delegations to walk out.
http://themargins.net/marginalia/archives/middle_east   (217 words)

  
 Baseless Comparisons: UN Security Council Resolutions on Iraq and Israel - Dore Gold
Moreover, UN resolutions on Iraq are self-enforcing, requiring Iraq alone to comply with their terms.
Additionally by harboring known international terrorist organizations, like Hamas, Hizballah, and the Islamic Jihad, Syria is violating the specific terms of UN Security Council Resolution 1373, adopted under Chapter VII of the UN Charter after the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.
Resolutions adopted under Chapter VI of the UN Charter - that deals with "Pacific Resolution of Disputes" - are implemented through a process of negotiation, conciliation, or arbitration between the parties to a dispute.
http://www.jcpa.org/brief/brief2-7.htm   (816 words)

  
 Timeline: United Nations Resolutions
Allows for refugees created in the war to return to their homes and receive compensation for any damages.
Noting that Israel "unreservedly accepts the obligations of the United Nations Charter and undertakes to honor them from the day when it becomes a Member of the United Nations," Israel is admitted to the UN.
This is a timeline and list of selected United Nations Resolutions passed in reference to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict.
http://www.mepc.org/public_asp/resources_links/TimelineUNRes.asp   (422 words)

  
 Al-Ahram Weekly Opinion Logical conclusions
Israel, however, has not been known to respect international law or UN resolutions.
This was the case of Sinai, which Israel fully evacuated in 1982; the same applies to Gaza and the West Bank, including Jerusalem, as well as the Golan Heights.
These same powers, however, have never admitted that Israeli aggression is a very good example of a situation in which such international pressure is necessary.
http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/1999/455/ed.htm   (367 words)

  
 Security Council Resolutions
If you do not have this software installed on your system, you may download it from Adobe's website.
Prepared for Internet by the UN Website Section, Department of Public Information - © United Nations 2005
http://www.un.org/documents/scres.htm   (56 words)

  
 Jordanian Removal of the PLO
This was followed in November 1967 with his acceptance of UN Security Council Resolution 242.
He viewed it as the most viable means by which the Palestinian problem could be resolved while also preserving an important Jordanian role in the West Bank.
After months of diplomatic wrangling, on November 22, 1967, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 242 as a guideline for a Middle East settlement.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/jordan-civil.htm   (1947 words)

  
 Ariga: Peace: Historic Documents and Treaties: UN Security Council Resolution 338
Calls upon all parties concerned to start immediately after the cease-fire the implementation of Security Council Resolution 242 (1967) in all of its parts;
Calls upon all parties to present fighting to cease all firing and terminate all military activity immediately, no later than 12 hours after the moment of the adoption of this decision, in the positions after the moment of the adoption of this decision, in the positions they now occupy;
Ariga: Peace: Historic Documents and Treaties: UN Security Council Resolution 338
http://www.ariga.com/treaties/338.shtml   (399 words)

  
 Palestine, Israel and the Arab-Israeli Conflict: A Primer-Page 8
After the 1967 war, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 242, which notes the "inadmissability of the acquisition of territory by force," and calls for Israeli withdrawal from lands seized in the war and the right of all states in the area to peaceful existence within secure and recognized boundaries.
By calling for recognition of every state in the area, Resolution 242 entailed unilateral Palestinian recognition of Israel without recognition of Palestinian national rights.
For many years the Palestinians rejected Resolution 242 because it does not acknowledge their right to national self-determination or to return to their homeland.
http://www.merip.org/palestine-israel_primer/plo-un242-pal-isr-primer.html   (591 words)

  
 BBC News KEY DOCUMENTS UN Security Council resolution 1397
Fourteen Security Council members voted for, none against.
On 12 March 2002, the United Nations Security Council adopted its first resolution explicitly calling for an Israeli and a Palestinian state "side by side" in the region.
The UN passed its first resolution explicitly calling for a Palestinian state
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/in_depth/middle_east/2001/israel_and_the_palestinians/key_documents/newsid_1872000/1872295.stm   (311 words)

  
 Palestinians — for Dummies
It opens by saying that the resolution 'states that East Jerusalem is part of the Palestinian territories which fell under the Israeli occupation in 1967.'
At that time the Arabs of Eretz Yisrael and their patrons in the surrounding countries rejected the opportunity the UN offered them in its partition resolution of 1947.11.29 to establish their Arab state in part of Mandatory Palestine alongside a Jewish state.
"The text of 242 at which I am looking says no such thing.
http://www.netzarim.co.il/Shared/NewsPale.htm   (423 words)

  
 Jerusalem Post: UN Security Council Resolution 1435@ HighBeam Research
Wednesday, September 25, 2002 -- The following is the text of a UN Security Council Resolution 1435 adopted yesterday by a 14-0 vote with the US abstaining.
Reaffirming its resolutions 242 (1967), 338 (1973), 1397 (2002), 1402 (2002), and 1403 (2002), as well as the statements of its president of 10 April 2002 and 18 July 2002, reiterating its grave concern at the tragic and violent events that have taken...
Jerusalem Post: UN Security Council Resolution 1435@ HighBeam Research
http://www.highbeam.com/library/doc0.asp?DOCID=1P1:67735204&refid=holomed_1   (212 words)

  
 World History :: Encyclopedia Index -- Un
INDEX OF ARTICLES: Un Articles are indexed by the first word of the title, including "A," "The," etc.
World History :: Encyclopedia Index -- Un Events Encyclopedia Localities Companies Surnames Shop
Un condamné à mort s'est échappé ou Le vent souffle où il veut
http://www.worldhistory.com/wiki/Un.htm   (817 words)

 About us   |  Why use us?   |  Press   |  Contact us

 Copyright © 2006 LegalOwl.com Usage implies agreement with terms.