Wikipedia:NPOV dispute - LegalOwl
About us  |  Why use us?  |  Press  |  Contact us

 

Topic: Wikipedia:NPOV dispute



  
 Talk:Cyprus dispute - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In this case, we would have two extreme POV articles heavily violating wikipedia's NPOV policy.
Dont try and turn this into the RoC explanation of the Cyprus dispute, this article is a political overview of the situation, if you want to talk about murders and death rates put it inCivilian casualties and displacements during the Cyprus conflict.
Perhaps there should be two pages: Cyprus Dispute (Turkish Cypriot view) and Cyprus Dispute (Greek Cypriot view).
http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cyprus_dispute   (1749 words)

  
 Talk:Derry - Indopedia, the Indological knowledgebase
I do not suggest that official names be used always (as is the case with, for example, the article Calcutta), but here, where there is a dispute over the name, official status should lend some weight to one title.
There are plenty of links to County Derry (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Whatlinkshereandtarget=County_Derry), and maybe others to [[County LondonderryCounty Derry]]; no doubt whoever wrote those articles thought it would be clearer to do that.
This is where NPOV runs up against the brick wall of ethnic suspicion, I'm afraid.
http://www.indopedia.org/Talk:Derry.html   (2706 words)

  
 CONIECTO
The first one, NPOV and meme evolution was an attempt to demonstrate how knowledge is distributed in wikipedia projects by proposing some so-called "real measurements".
I browsed the list myself, and I was a bit surprised to discover an article on Adrian Paunescu, a Romanian poet turned into politician (a controversial character, but the dispute is about including or not in the article a phrase about his wife who provoqued a car accident!).
But many people back home doubt about the reliability of the content and avoid using it, and every time I tried to encourage people to become wikipedians, their answer was either they don't feel they have the competence to do it, or they prefer to contribute information to the site of someone they already know.
http://coniecto.blogspot.com/2005_08_01_coniecto_archive.html#112490339028148884   (4286 words)

 About us   |  Why use us?   |  Press   |  Contact us

 Copyright © 2006 LegalOwl.com Usage implies agreement with terms.